Insights for equine and high-risk industry leaders.
The Artificial Intelligence Era – How AI is transforming the equine sector
Businesses and innovators across the equine sector are embracing rapid technological change. From horse training and performance to breeding and veterinary care, artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how horses are bred, trained and managed.
Business leaders that can adapt early have the opportunity to make faster, more informed decisions and connect with customers in new ways. But this isn’t a simple “tech upgrade”. AI raises complex questions about data ownership, IP rights and liability when something goes wrong.
When Arena Conditions Turn Dangerous - High Court rules on organiser liability in Tapp v ABCRA
The High Court’s decision in Tapp v Australian Bushmen’s Campdraft & Rodeo Association Ltd is a landmark reminder for event organisers in equine sport. Emily Tapp, an experienced rider, was left paralysed after her horse slipped on a deteriorated arena surface. Despite multiple falls and competitor warnings, organisers continued the event without inspection. The Court held this was a breach of duty, rejecting the defence of “obvious risk” and awarding $6.75 million in damages. The case underscores the obligation to act promptly when safety concerns arise - particularly with arena surfaces - and the limits of relying on assumption-of-risk defences.
Defamation in the Horse Industry - Protecting reputation in the digital age
False allegations, negative online reviews and public disputes can cause lasting damage to a professional reputation - and the horse industry is not immune. Defamation occurs when someone publishes material that harms another’s reputation, whether online or in conversation, and may apply even if the person is not named but can be identified. The case of Aurisch v Wilson shows the significant damages that can be awarded for defamatory Facebook reviews. With strict time limits for claims and complex defences, it’s critical to act quickly if you are affected. Seek legal advice before posting - or responding - to avoid costly consequences.
National Horse Traceability - What Australia’s new system could mean for you
Australia’s horse population is estimated at 900,000–1.8 million, yet there is no national system to identify and track them. Unlike livestock and companion animals, horses are largely unregulated, making disease control, biosecurity, and ownership disputes more challenging. A proposed National Horse Traceability System would require all properties with horses to hold a Property Identification Code (PIC) and record horse movements between PICs lasting over 24 hours. While microchipping would remain voluntary, new record-keeping duties would apply to owners, carers, event organisers, vets and transporters. This reform promises stronger biosecurity but increased compliance obligations - making it vital to understand the coming changes.
When Horses Escape - Understanding liability for road accidents
A loose horse on the road can cause serious injury, property damage and complex legal disputes. In most cases, owners are responsible for keeping horses securely contained, and liability in negligence can arise if they fail to take reasonable precautions. However, as the case of Woodley Osteopathic Services v TAC shows, the outcome depends on the specific facts - including who had control of the horse, the condition of gates and fences and the foreseeability of escape. Owners, agistment operators and property managers should regularly inspect containment measures, clarify responsibilities and review insurance cover to minimise risk and legal exposure.
